Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Häufige urologisch-sexualmedizinische Themen in der Praxis sind das Thema des MMW-Webinars am 5. Juni von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. Konkret geht es um die Frage, wann bei Harnwegsinfektionen auf Antibiotika verzichtet werden kann, und um ein Update zur Therapie von Libido- und Potenzstörungen des Mannes. Der dritte Vortrag behandelt sexuell übertragbare Krankheiten. Stellen Sie Ihre Fragen an die Experten und sammeln Sie 2 CME-Punkte. Jetzt gleich anmelden!
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Erschienen in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 4/2023

19.07.2022 | Review Article

Application of chemical factors for acceleration of consolidation phase of the distraction osteogenesis: a scoping review

verfasst von: Sadra Mohaghegh, Fatemeh Alirezaei, Nima Ahmadi, Farnaz Kouhestani, Saeed Reza Motamedian

Erschienen in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to analyze the effect of injecting chemical factors compared to conventional distraction osteogenesis (DO) treatment on the bone formation of the distracted area of the maxillofacial region in human and animal studies.

Method

Electronic search was done in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane database for studies published until September 2021. The studies’ risk of bias (ROB) was assessed using the Cochrane Collaborations and NIH quality assessment tools. Meta-analyses were performed to assess the difference in the amount of bone formation and maximal load tolerance.

Results

Among a total of 58 included studies, eight studies analyzed the bone formation rate of the distracted area in human models and others in animal models. Results of the human studies showed acceptable outcomes in the case of using bone morphogenic protein-2 (BMP-2), autologous bone-platelet gel, and calcium sulfate. However, using platelet reach plasma does not increase the rate of bone formation significantly. Quantitative analyses showed that both BMP-2 (SMD = 26.57; 95% CI = 18.86 to 34.28) and neuron growth factor (NGF) (SMD = 16.19; 95% CI = 9.64 to 22.75) increase the amount of bone formation. Besides, NGF increased the amount of load tolerance significantly (SMD = 30.03; 95% CI = 19.91 to 40.16). Additionally, BMP-2 has no significant impact on the post-treatment maxillary length (SMD = 9.19; 95% CI =  − 2.35 to 20.73).

Conclusion

Limited number of human studies with low quality used chemical factors to enhance osteogenesis and showed acceptable results. However, more studies with higher quality are required.
Literatur
1.
Harikrishnan P (2019) Krishnan’s comprehensive classification for distraction osteogenesis of maxilla and mandible. J Craniofac Surg 30(8):2509–2511PubMedCrossRef
2.
Ilizarov GA (1990) Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 250:8–26CrossRef
3.
Codivilla A (1904) On the means of lengthening, in the lower limbs, the muscles and tissues which are shortened through deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994(301):4–9
4.
Ramanathan M et al (2020) Distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery: demystifying differences in concepts, techniques and outcomes. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 19(4):477–489PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
Mofid MM et al (2001) Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of 3278 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 108(5):1103–1114PubMedCrossRef
6.
Cho BC et al (2005) The effect of chitosan bead encapsulating calcium sulfate as an injectable bone substitute on consolidation in the mandibular distraction osteogenesis of a dog model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63(12):1753–1764PubMedCrossRef
7.
Alzahrani MM et al (2014) The effect of altering the mechanical loading environment on the expression of bone regenerating molecules in cases of distraction osteogenesis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 5:214PubMedCrossRef
8.
Lou S et al (2018) Effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on distraction osteogenesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res 13(1):205PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Morcos MW, Al-Jallad H, Hamdy R (2015) Comprehensive review of adipose stem cells and their implication in distraction osteogenesis and bone regeneration. Biomed Res Int 2015:842975PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
Ye B et al (2017) Effects of intermittent low-dose parathyroid hormone treatment on rapid mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rabbits. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 75(8):1722–1731PubMedCrossRef
11.
Pripatnanont P et al (2015) Effect of osteogenic periosteal distraction by a modified Hyrax device with and without platelet-rich fibrin on bone formation in a rabbit model: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44(5):656–663PubMedCrossRef
12.
Cho BC et al (2002) Clinical application of injectable calcium sulfate on early bony consolidation in distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of craniofacial microsomia. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 13(3):465–475PubMedCrossRef
13.
Alp YE et al (2017) Effects of local low-dose alendronate injections into the distraction gap on new bone formation and distraction rate on distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 28(8):2174–2178PubMedCrossRef
14.
Tricco AC et al (2018) PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 169(7):467–473PubMedCrossRef
15.
16.
17.
Higgins JPT, T.J., Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2nd Edition. 2019, Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons.
18.
Robiony M et al (2002) Osteogenesis distraction and platelet-rich plasma for bone restoration of the severely atrophic mandible: preliminary results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60(6):630–635PubMedCrossRef
19.
Robiony M et al (2008) Osteogenesis distraction and platelet-rich plasma: combined use in restoration of severe atrophic mandible. Long-term results Clinical oral implants research 19(11):1202–1210PubMedCrossRef
20.
Tom WK et al (2009) Pretreatment of distraction docking sites with bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2). J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67(9):2026–2034PubMedCrossRef
21.
Schoemann MB et al (2012) Immediate mandibular distraction in mandibular hypoplasia and upper airway obstruction. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 23(7):S39–S42CrossRef
22.
Carstens MH et al (2005) Reconstruction of# 7 facial cleft with distraction-assisted in situ osteogenesis (DISO): role of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 with Helistat-activated collagen implant. J Craniofac Surg 16(6):1023–1032PubMedCrossRef
23.
Franco J, Coppage J, Carstens MH (2010) Mandibular distraction using bone morphogenic protein and rapid distraction in neonates with Pierre Robin syndrome. J Craniofac Surg 21(4):1158–1161PubMedCrossRef
24.
Menezes DJ et al (2016) Effect of platelet-rich plasma in alveolar distraction osteogenesis: a controlled clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54(1):83–87PubMedCrossRef
25.
Schoemann MB et al (2012) Immediate mandibular distraction in mandibular hypoplasia and upper airway obstruction. J Craniofac Surg 23(7 Suppl 1):1981–1984PubMed
26.
Carstens MH et al (2005) Reconstruction of #7 facial cleft with distraction-assisted in situ osteogenesis (DISO): role of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 with Helistat-activated collagen implant. J Craniofac Surg 16(6):1023–1032PubMedCrossRef
27.
Robiony M et al (2008) Osteogenesis distraction and platelet-rich plasma: combined use in restoration of severe atrophic mandible. Long-term results Clin Oral Implants Res 19(11):1202–1210PubMedCrossRef
28.
Xu H et al (2013) Effects of platelet-rich plasma and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on suture distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 24(2):645–650PubMedCrossRef
29.
Yonezawa H et al (2006) Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) on bone consolidation on distraction osteogenesis: a preliminary study in rabbit mandibles. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 34(5):270–276PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zheng LW et al (2006) Evaluation of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rabbits: Effect of dosage and number of doses on formation of bone. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44(6):487–494PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zheng LW, Cheung LK (2006) Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on mandibular distraction at different rates in a rabbit model. Tissue Eng 12(11):3181–3188PubMedCrossRef
32.
Cheung LK and Zheng LW (2006) Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on mandibular distraction at different rates in an experimental model. J Craniofac Surg 17(1): p. 100–8; discussion 109–10
33.
Ren LF et al (2018) Effects of rhBMP-2/7 Heterodimer and RADA16 hydrogel scaffold on bone formation during rabbit mandibular distraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 76(5):1092.e1-1092.e10PubMedCrossRef
34.
Issa JP et al (2009) Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on bone formation in the acute distraction osteogenesis of rat mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res 20(11):1286–1292PubMedCrossRef
35.
Kim IS et al (2002) Role of BMP, betaig-h3, and chitosan in early bony consolidation in distraction osteogenesis in a dog model. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(6):1966–1977PubMedCrossRef
36.
Rachmiel A, Aizenbud D, Peled M (2004) Enhancement of bone formation by bone morphogenetic protein-2 during alveolar distraction: an experimental study in sheep. J Periodontol 75(11):1524–1531PubMedCrossRef
37.
Kroczek A et al (2010) Effects of osteoinduction on bone regeneration in distraction: results of a pilot study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 38(5):334–344PubMedCrossRef
38.
Herford A et al (2016) rhBMP-2 applied as support of distraction osteogenesis: a split-mouth histological study over nonhuman primates mandibles
39.
Cao J et al (2012) Local injection of nerve growth factor via a hydrogel enhances bone formation during mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 113(1):48–53PubMedCrossRef
40.
Wang L et al (2006) Locally applied nerve growth factor enhances bone consolidation in a rabbit model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Orthop Res 24(12):2238–2245PubMedCrossRef
41.
Wang L et al (2010) Application of nerve growth factor by gel increases formation of bone in mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rabbits. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48(7):515–519PubMedCrossRef
42.
Ye B et al (2017) Effects of intermittent low-dose parathyroid hormone treatment on rapid mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rabbits. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 75(8):1722–1731PubMedCrossRef
43.
Tang Z-L et al (2016) An examination of differences in the new bone formation promoted by different doses of recombinant human parathyroid hormone during mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(2)
44.
Ali MN et al (2012) Effects of intermittent parathyroid hormone treatment on new bone formation during distraction osteogenesis in the rat mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 114(1):e36-42PubMedCrossRef
45.
Gallagher KK et al (2013) Role of parathyroid hormone therapy in reversing radiation-induced nonunion and normalization of radiomorphometrics in a murine mandibular model of distraction osteogenesis. Head Neck 35(12):1732–1737PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
Higuchi Y et al (2010) Effect of recombinant human fibroblast growth factor-2 on bone formation in rabbit mandibular distraction models using β-tricalcium phosphate. Congenit Anom 50(2):95–104CrossRef
47.
Kimura A et al (2014) Gelatin hydrogel as a carrier of recombinant human fibroblast growth factor-2 during rat mandibular distraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72(10):2015–2031PubMedCrossRef
48.
Casap N et al (2008) VEGF facilitates periosteal distraction-induced osteogenesis in rabbits: a micro-computerized tomography study. Tissue Eng Part A 14(2):247–253PubMedCrossRef
49.
Stewart KJ et al (1999) A quantitative analysis of the effect of insulin-like growth factor-1 infusion during mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rabbits. Br J Plast Surg 52(5):343–350PubMedCrossRef
50.
Bou Assi T et al (2013) Effect of autologous platelet-rich plasma on distraction osteogenesis in the mandible of rabbits: a morphologic and morphometric approach. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 27(1):177–187PubMed
51.
Mihmanli A et al (2009) Effects of recombinant human erythropoietin on mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67(11):2337–2343PubMedCrossRef
52.
Altay B et al (2020) Effect of systemic oxytocin administration on new bone formation and distraction rate in rabbit mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 78(7):1171–1182PubMedCrossRef
53.
Jiang X et al (2015) GYY4137 promotes bone formation in a rabbit distraction osteogenesis model: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73(4):732.e1–6PubMedCrossRef
54.
Gokce SM et al (2015) The effect of human amniotic fluid on mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44(3):404–411PubMedCrossRef
55.
Akçay H et al (2019) Vitamin E promotes bone formation in a distraction osteogenesis model. J Craniofac Surg 30(8):2315–2318PubMedCrossRef
56.
Jiang X et al (2011) Effect of intermittent administration of adiponectin on bone regeneration following mandibular osteodistraction in rabbits. J Orthop Res 29(7):1081–1085PubMedCrossRef
57.
Dayisoylu EH et al (2016) Effects of osteoformin in the rapid distraction osteogenesis of rabbit mandibles. J Pak Med Assoc 66(2):135–139PubMed
58.
Pampu AA et al (2009) The effects of osteoformin on mineralisation and quality of newly formed bone during mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rabbits. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108(6):833–837PubMedCrossRef
59.
Tekin U et al (2008) Effects of alendronate on rate of distraction in rabbit mandibles. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66(10):2042–2049PubMedCrossRef
60.
Davidson EH et al (2011) Augmenting neovascularization accelerates distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(2):406–414PubMedCrossRef
61.
Terheyden H et al (2003) Acceleration of callus maturation using rhOP-1 in mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a rat model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32(5):528–533PubMedCrossRef
62.
Dundar S et al (2017) Comparison of the effects of local and systemic zoledronic acid application on mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 28(7):e621–e625PubMedCrossRef
63.
64.
65.
Donneys A et al (2012) Deferoxamine enhances the vascular response of bone regeneration in mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(4):850–856PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
66.
Zhang YB et al (2014) Local injection of substance P increases bony formation during mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rats. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52(8):697–702PubMedCrossRef
67.
Acikan I et al (2018) Systemic melatonin application increases bone formation in mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Braz Oral Res 32:e85PubMedCrossRef
68.
Cho BC et al (2003) The bone regenerative effect of growth hormone on consolidation in mandibular distraction osteogenesis of a dog model. J Craniofac Surg 14(3):417–425PubMedCrossRef
69.
Cho BC et al (2002) The role of hyaluronic acid, chitosan, and calcium sulfate and their combined effect on early bony consolidation in distraction osteogenesis of a canine model. J Craniofac Surg 13(6):783–793PubMedCrossRef
70.
Baiomy AA et al (2014) Experimental comparison of the effects of locally administered zoledronic acid and alendronate on the rate of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in dogs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 118(1):35–42PubMedCrossRef
71.
Terbish M et al (2015) Accelerated bone formation in distracted alveolar bone after injection of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Periodontol 86(9):1078–1086PubMedCrossRef
72.
Morillo CMR et al (2018) Efficacy of stem cells on bone consolidation of distraction osteogenesis in animal models: a systematic review. Braz Oral Res 32:e83PubMedCrossRef
73.
Tee BC and Z Sun (2015) Mandibular distraction osteogenesis assisted by cell-based tissue engineering: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 18 Suppl 1(01):39–49
74.
rhBMP2/7 (2010) Heterodimer: an osteoblastogenesis inducer of not higher potency but lower effective concentration compared with rhBMP2 and rhBMP7 homodimers. Tissue Eng A 16(3):879–887
75.
Isaacs MJ et al (2010) Bone morphogenetic protein-2 and -6 heterodimer illustrates the nature of ligand-receptor assembly. Mol Endocrinol 24(7):1469–1477PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
76.
Sebald W et al (2004) Molecular recognition in bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)/receptor interaction 385(8):697–710
77.
Nuntanaranont T, Suttapreyasri S, Vongvatcharanon S (2014) Quantitative expression of bone-related cytokines induced by mechanical tension–stress during distraction osteogenesis in a rabbit mandible. J Investig Clin Dent 5(4):255–265PubMedCrossRef
78.
Haque T et al (2008) Characterizing the BMP pathway in a wild type mouse model of distraction osteogenesis. Bone 42(6):1144–1153PubMedCrossRef
79.
García-Castellano JM, Díaz-Herrera P, Morcuende JA (2000) Is bone a target-tissue for the nervous system? New advances on the understanding of their interactions. Iowa Orthop J 20:49–58PubMedPubMedCentral
80.
Grills B, Schuijers J and  Ward AR (1997) Topical application of nerve growth factor improves fracture healing in rats. J Orthop Res 15
81.
Yada M, Yamaguchi K, Tsuji T (1994) NGF stimulates differentiation of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 205(2):1187–1193PubMedCrossRef
82.
Ozec Y et al (2006) Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 17(1):80–83PubMedCrossRef
83.
Yao Y et al (2011) Synergistic enhancement of new bone formation by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and osteoprotegerin in trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis: a pilot study in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(11):e446–e455PubMedCrossRef
84.
Guiran Z et al (2017) A new way to accelerate the distraction of the transpalatal suture in growing dogs using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 54(2):193–201PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Application of chemical factors for acceleration of consolidation phase of the distraction osteogenesis: a scoping review
verfasst von
Sadra Mohaghegh
Fatemeh Alirezaei
Nima Ahmadi
Farnaz Kouhestani
Saeed Reza Motamedian
Publikationsdatum
19.07.2022
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2023
Print ISSN: 1865-1550
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-1569
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-022-01097-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2023

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 4/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Clinical outcome following conservative treatment of 58 mandibular ameloblastoma patients: a retrospective study

Original Article

The Hyrax appliance with tooth anchorage variations in surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: a finite element analysis

Original Article

A survey regarding the organizational aspects and quality systems of in-house 3D printing in oral and maxillofacial surgery in Germany

Original Article

Characteristics and surgical management of pure trapdoor fracture of the orbital floor in adults: a 15-year review

Review Article

Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of dexmedetomidine to midazolam as premedication and a sedative agent in pediatric patients undergoing dental procedures

Original Article

Does the type of planning in orthognathic surgery influence patient satisfaction?

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.
Bildnachweise