nach oben

Erschienen in:

14.03.2023 | Original Article

TiO₂ nanotube-based nanotechnology applied to high-viscosity conventional glass-ionomer cement: ultrastructural analyses and physicochemical characterization

verfasst von: Kamila Rosamilia Kantovitz, Natália Russo Carlos, Ivania Aparecida Pimenta Santos Silva, Caroline Braido, Bruna Carolina Costa, Igor Lebedenco Kitagawa, Francisco Humberto Nociti-Jr, Roberta Tarkany Basting, Francine Kuhl Panzarella de Figueiredo, Paulo Noronha Lisboa-Filho

Erschienen in: Odontology | Ausgabe 4/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study characterized TiO₂ nanotube (TiO₂-nt) ultrastructure and morphology, and the physicochemical impact on high-viscosity conventional glass-ionomer cement (GIC). TiO₂-nt was synthesized by the alkaline method (n = 3), assessed by scanning (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM), and was added (3%, 5%, 7%—in weight) to KM (Ketac Molar EasyMix™). Analyses included: SEM; Energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS); Raman spectroscopy (RAMAN); Setting time with Gillmore needles (ST); Color (Co); Radiopacity (XR); Water sorption (WS); and solubility (SO). Quantitative data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey’s tests (chr = 0.05). External and internal TiO₂-nt diameters were 11 ± 2 nm and 6 ± 0 nm, respectively. Data analyses showed: (i) TiO₂-nt present into KM matrix, with a concentration-dependent increase of Ti levels into KM, (ii) physical interaction between KM and TiO₂-nt, (iii) longer initial ST for the 7% group compared to KM and 3% groups (p ≤ 0.01), (iv) decreased luminosity and yellowness for the 5% and 7% groups, (v) 36% greater radiopacity for the 5% group compared to enamel, dentin, and KM, and (vi) lower SO values for the 5% group, with no significant differences on WS across the groups. TiO₂-nt displayed physical interaction with KM matrix, and also modified SO, XR and Co, without affecting ST. This study provides information on the potential impact of TiO₂-nt on GIC performance. TiO₂-nt may be proposed to boost confidence among dental surgeons in terms of GIC’s handling characteristics, success rate and differential diagnostic.

Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent. 1972;132(4):133–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802810.CrossRef

Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillip’s science of dental materials. 12th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2013.

Tonmukayakul U, Arrow P. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the atraumatic restorative treatment-based approach to managing early childhood caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2017;45(1):92–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12265.CrossRefPubMed

Mustafa HA, Soares AP, Paris S, Elhennawy K, Zaslansky P. The forgotten merits of GIC restorations: a systematic review. Clin Oral Invest. 2020;24(7):2189–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03334-0.CrossRef

de Amorim RG, Frencken JE, Raggio DP, Chen X, Hu X, Leal SC. Survival percentages of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations and sealants in posterior teeth: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(8):2703–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2625-5.CrossRefPubMed

Mese A, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Sorption and solubility of luting cements in different solutions. Dent Mater J. 2008;27(5):702–9. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.702.CrossRefPubMed

Nicholson JW. Maturation processes in glass-ionomer dental cements. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2018;4(1):63–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2018.1497492.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Nicholson JW, Coleman NJ, Sidhu SK. Kinetics of ion release from a conventional glass ionomer cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2021;32:30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-021-06501-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Menezes-Silva R, Cabral RN, Pascotto RC, Borges AFS, Martins CC, Navarro MFL, Sidhu SK, Leal SC. Mechanical and optical properties of conventional restorative glass-ionomer cements—a systematic review. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019;27: e2018357. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0357.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Padovani GC, Feitosa VP, Sauro S, Tay FR, Duran G, Paula AJ, Duran N. Advances in dental material through nanotechnology: facts, perspectives and toxicological aspects. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33(11):621–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.09.005.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Vimbela GV, Ngo SM, Fraze C, Yang L, Stout DA. Antibacterial properties and toxicity from metallic nanomaterials. Int J Nanomed. 2017;12:3941–65. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S134526.CrossRef

12.

Sajjad A, Wan Bakar WZW, Mohamad D, Kannan TP. Various recent reinforcement phase incorporations and modifications in glass ionomer powder compositions: a comprehensive review. J Int Oral Health. 2018;10(4):161–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_160_18.CrossRef

13.

Moheet IA, Luddin N, Rahman IA, Kannan TP, Ghani NRNA, Masudi SM. Modifications of glass ionomer cement powder by addition of recently fabricated nano-fillers and their effect on the properties: a review. Eur J Dent. 2019;13(3):470–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1693524.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Zhao J, Xie D. Effect of nanoparticles on wear resistance and surface hardness of a dental glass-ionomer cement. J Compos Mat. 2009;43:2739–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998309345341.CrossRef

15.

Elsaka SE, Hamouda IM, Swain MV. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles addition to a conventional glass-ionomer restorative: influence on physical and antibacterial properties. J Dent. 2011;39(9):589–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.05.006.CrossRefPubMed

16.

El-Negoly SA, El-Fallal AA, El-Sherbiny IM. A new modification for improving shear bond strength and other mechanical properties of conventional glass-ionomer restorative materials. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(1):41–7. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a30541.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Cibim DD, Saito MT, Giovani PA, Borges AFS, Pecorari VGA, Gomes OP, Lisboa-Filho PN, Nociti-Junior FH, Puppin-Rontani RM, Kantovitz KR. Novel nanotechnology of TiO₂ improves physical-chemical and biological properties of glass ionomer cement. Int J Biomater. 2017;2017:7123919. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7123919.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Kantovitz KR, Fernandes FP, Feitosa IV, Lazzarini MO, Denucci GC, Gomes OP, Giovani PA, Moreira KMS, Pecorari VGA, Borges AFS, Nociti-Jr FH, Basting RT, Lisboa-Filho PN, Puppin-Rontani RM. TiO₂ nanotubes improve physico-mechanical properties of glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater. 2020;36(3):e85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.01.018.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Meng X, Banis MN, Cheng D, Li X, Zhang Y, Li R, Abou-Rachid H, Sun X. Controllable atomic layer deposition of one-dimensional nanotubular TiO₂. Appl Surf Sci. 2013;266:132–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.11.116.CrossRef

20.

Araújo IJS, Ricardo MG, Gomes OP, Giovani PA, Puppin-Rontani J, Pecorari VA, Martinez EF, Napimoga MH, Nociti Junior FH, Puppin-Rontani RM, Lisboa-Filho PN, Kantovitz KR. Titanium dioxide nanotubes added to glass ionomer cements affect S mutans viability and mechanisms of virulence. Braz Oral Res. 2021;35:62. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.CrossRef

21.

Arruda LB, Santos CM, Orlandi MO, Schreiner WH, Lisboa-Filho PN. Formation and evolution of TiO₂ nanotubes in alkaline synthesis. Ceram Int. 2015;41:2884–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.10.113.CrossRef

22.

ISO 9917–2: Dentistry—Water-based cements—Part 2: Resin-modified cements. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2010.

23.

Carlos NR, Pinto AVD, Amaral FLB, França FMG, Turssi CP, Basting RT. Influence of staining solutions on color change and enamel surface properties during at-home and in-office dental bleaching: an in situ study. Oper Dent. 2019;44(9):595–608. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-236-C.CrossRefPubMed

24.

ISO 13116 (2014) Dentistry—test method for determining radio-opacity of materials. Geneva: Switzerland; International Organization for Standardization

25.

ISO 4049 (2019) Dentistry Polymer Based Restorative Materials. Geneva: Switzerland; International Organization for Standardization

26.

Chen X, Mao SS. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications. Chem Rev. 2007;107(7):2891–959. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0500535.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Wypych A, Bobowska I, Tracz M, Opasinska A, Kadlubowski S, Krzywania-Kaliszewska A, Grobelny J, Wojciechowski P. Dieletric Properties and characterization of titanium dioxide obtained by different chemistry methods. J Nanomater. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/124814.CrossRef

28.

Roy P, Berger S, Schmuki P. TiO₂ nanotubes: synthesis and applications. Angew Chem. 2011;50(13):2904–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201001374.CrossRef

29.

Hanaor DAH, Sorrell CC. Review of the anatase to rutile phase transformation. J Mater Sci. 2011;46:855–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-5113-0.CrossRef

30.

Young AM, Sherpa A, Pearson G, Schottlander B, Waters DN. Use of Raman spectroscopy in the characterization of the acid-base reaction in glass-ionomer cements. Biomaterials. 2000;21(19):1971–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00081-8.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Tadjiev D, Hand RJ. Surface hydration and nanoindentation of silicate glasses. J Non Cryst Solids. 2010;356(2):102–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.10.005.CrossRef

32.

Fareed MA, Stamboulis A. Nanoclay addition to conventional glass-ionomer cements: influence on properties. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(4):456–63. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.143619.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Yamakami SA, Ubaldini ALM, Sato F, Medina Neto A, Pascotto RC, Baesso ML. Study of the chemical interaction between a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement and dentin. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26: e20170384. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0384.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Moshaverinia A, Roohpour N, Chee WWL, Schricker SR. A review of powder modifications in conventional glass-ionomer dental cements. J Mater Chem. 2011;21:1319–28.CrossRef

35.

De Caluwé T, Vercruysse CWJ, Fraeyman S, Verbeeck RMH. The influence of particle size and fluorine content of aluminosilicate glass on the glass ionomer cement properties. Dent Mater. 2014;30(9):1029–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.06.003.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Lin-Vien D, Colthup NB, Fateley WG, Gasselli JG. The handbook of infrared and Raman characteristic frequencies of organic molecules. San Diego: Academic Press; 1991.

37.

Ana ID, Matsuya S, Ohta M, Ishikawa K. Effects of added bioactive glass on the setting and mechanical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Biomaterials. 2003;24(18):3061–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00151-0.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Dickey B, Price R, Boyd D. Evidence of a complex species controlling the setting reaction of glass ionomer cements. Dent Mat. 2016;32(4):596–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.01.012.CrossRef

39.

Prentice LH, Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. The effect of ytterbium fluoride and barium sulphate nanoparticles on the reactivity and strength of a glass-ionomer cement. Dent Mater. 2006;22(8):746–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.001.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Shahid S, Hassan U, Billington RW, Hill RG, Anderson P. Glass ionomer cements: effect of strontium substitution on esthetics, radiopacity and fluoride release. Dent Mater. 2014;30(3):308–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.003.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Williams JA, Billington RW. The radiopacity of glass ionomer dental materials. J Oral Rehabil. 1990;17(3):245–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1990.tb00005.x.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Garcia IM, Leitune VCB, Balbinot GS, Samuel SMW, Collares FM. Influence of niobium pentoxide addition on the properties of glass ionomer cements. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2016;2(1):138–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2016.1239182.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Lachowski KM, Botta SB, Lascala CA, Matos AB, Sobral MAP. Study of the radio-opacity of base and liner dental materials using a digital radiography system. Dent Maxillofacial Radiol. 2013;42(2):20120153. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20120153.CrossRef

44.

Carvalho EV, de Paula DM, Andrade Neto DM, Costa LS, Dias DF, Feitosa VP, Fechine PBA. Radiopacity and mechanical properties of dental adhesives with strontium hydroxyapatite nanofillers. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;101:103447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103447.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Fonseca RB, Branco CA, Quagliatto PS, Gonçalves LS, Soares CJ, Carlo HL, Correr-Sobrinho L. Influence of powder/liquid ratio on the radiodensity and diametral tensile strength of glass ionomer cements. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18:577–84. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-775720100006000008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Hitij T, Fidler A. Radiopacity of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(4):1167–77. https://doi.org/10.10007/s00784-012-0797-y.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Yasa B, Kucukyilmaz E, Yasa E, Ertas ET. Comparative study of radiopacity of resin-based and glass ionomer-based bulk-fill restoratives using digital radiography. J Oral Sci. 2015;57(2):79–85. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.57.79.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Qasim SS, Bakr DK, Rasheed DH. Evaluating the effect of addition of titanium dioxide nanoparticle on some physical properties of flowable composite resin. Ind J Forens Med Toxic. 2021;14:2. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v14i2.3337.CrossRef

49.

Ayre WN, Scully N, Elford C, Evans BA, Rowe W, Rowlands J, Mitha R, Malpas P, Manti P, Holt C, Morgan-Jones R, Birchall JC, Denyer SP, Evans SL. Alternative radiopacifiers for polymethyl methacrylate bone cements: Silane-treated anatase titanium dioxide and yttria-stabilised zirconium dioxide. J Biomater Appl. 2021;35(10):1235–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328220983797.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Almaroof A, Ali A, Mannocci F, Deb S. Semi-interpenetrating network composites reinforced with Kevlar fibers for dental post fabrication. Dent Mater J. 2019;38(4):511–21. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-040.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Berry HM. Cervical burnout and Mach band: two shadows of doubt in radiologic interpretation of carious lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983;106(5):622–5. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1983.0109.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Sava S, Colgecen O, Yasa B, Kucukyilmaz E. Color stability, roughness, and water sorption/solubility of glass ionomer-based restorative materials. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22(6):824–32. https://doi.org/10.5103/njcp_592_18.CrossRef

53.

Singer L, Bierbaum G, Kehl K, Bourauel C. Evaluation of the flexural strength, water sorption, and solubility of a glass ionomer dental cement modified using phytomedicine. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(23):5352. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235352.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Gemalmaz D, Yoruc B, Ozcan M, Alkumru HN. Effect of early water contact on solubility of glass ionomer luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:474–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70014-9.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Carvalho-Júnior JR, Guimarães LF, Correr-Sobrinho L, Pécora JD, Sousa-Neto MD. Evaluation of solubility, disintegration, and dimensional alterations of a glass ionomer root canal sealer. Braz Dent J. 2003;14:114–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402003000200008.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Bhatia HP, Singh S, Sood S, Sharma N. A comparative evaluation of sorption, solubility, and compressive strength of three different glass ionomer cements in artificial saliva: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;10:49–54. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1407.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

57.

Galal RS, El Kadi AS, Ghoneim MN. Surface roughness and solubility of a nano-filled resin modified glass-ionomer (in vitro study). Alex Dent J. 2018;43(2):123–7. https://doi.org/10.21608/ADJALEXU.2018.57757.CrossRef

Titel: TiO2 nanotube-based nanotechnology applied to high-viscosity conventional glass-ionomer cement: ultrastructural analyses and physicochemical characterization
verfasst von: Kamila Rosamilia Kantovitz
Natália Russo Carlos
Ivania Aparecida Pimenta Santos Silva
Caroline Braido
Bruna Carolina Costa
Igor Lebedenco Kitagawa
Francisco Humberto Nociti-Jr
Roberta Tarkany Basting
Francine Kuhl Panzarella de Figueiredo
Paulo Noronha Lisboa-Filho
Publikationsdatum: 14.03.2023
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in: Odontology / Ausgabe 4/2023
Print ISSN: 1618-1247
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-1255
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-023-00799-9

Update Zahnmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

TiO₂ nanotube-based nanotechnology applied to high-viscosity conventional glass-ionomer cement: ultrastructural analyses and physicochemical characterization

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Update Zahnmedizin

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2023

Establishing protein expression profiles involved in tooth development using a proteomic approach

3D–2D microleakage assessment of preheated bulk-fill composite resin applied with different parameters: a micro-CT analysis

Assessment of dentin mineral density of human teeth using micro-computed tomography in two kilovoltage levels

The anti-adherence activity and bactericidal effect of GO against Streptococcus mutans from Iraqi dental patients

Macrophages immunomodulation induced by Porphyromonas gingivalis and oral antimicrobial peptides

NAT10 promotes osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells by regulating VEGFA-mediated PI3K/AKT signaling pathway through ac4C modification

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Update Zahnmedizin