As 30–50% of patients develop AF recurrence following first catheter ablation [
3], there is a continued need for optimizing the selection of patients to identify those who will not benefit at all from ablation treatment—to prevent unnecessary procedures—as well as those who will likely need re-ablation and therefore require close monitoring following their first ablation. A meta-analysis from Jiang et al. has previously established that plasma ANP can predict AF recurrence following catheter ablation [
4]. This meta-analysis included six studies with a collective population of 298 patients and 113 recurrences. However, the studies were heterogeneous in design and included AF recurrence within the 3-month blanking period, during which AF events are generally not considered failure of catheter ablation [
14]. When only considering studies with AF recurrence outside the blanking period, plasma ANP was not predictive of AF recurrence. The lack of predictive ability of plasma ANP has since been confirmed by Nakanishi [
9], and similar results have been observed for other ANP precursors [
15,
16]. Overall, the findings consistently show that ANP is not predictive of significant AF recurrence and stresses a need for exploring other ways to use ANP instead. So far, studies investigating the predictive value of natriuretic peptides have primarily operated under the assumption that increasing natriuretic peptide concentration translates into increased AF recurrence risk in a linear fashion. However, Daniels et al. outlined another way of considering the association between natriuretic peptide concentration and AF risk by linking the endocrine function to the atrial viability [
10]. In patients without atrial fibrosis, a low natriuretic peptide concentration represents a healthy atrium and a high concentration of natriuretic peptide reflects pathology. In patients with extensive atrial fibrosis the interpretation of natriuretic peptide concentration is more complicated as a low natriuretic peptide concentration may indicate an endocrine burnout due to degenerative changes [
17,
18], and a low ANP concentration has indeed previously been shown to predict AF recurrence following cardioversion [
19]. On the other hand, a high concentration in part reflects ongoing disease state but also that the atrium is healthy enough to produce a secretory response. This complex response in natriuretic peptide secretion with progressive mechanical dysfunction may explain why increasing atrial natriuretic peptide concentration failed to predict AF recurrence in patients with low LA strain. The reason why LA strain, as opposed to the other measures of LA distension, modified the association between natriuretic peptides and AF may be explained by the fact it is a direct measure of atrial tissue function. By extension, LA strain has been shown to be closely linked to atrial fibrosis [
20], and may be therefore be used as a surrogate measure of atrial fibrosis.