nach oben

Odontology

Erschienen in:

14.07.2022 | Original Article

Effect of different irrigation activation techniques on irrigation penetration into the simulated lateral canals

verfasst von: Mehmet Eren Fidan, Ali Erdemir

Erschienen in: Odontology | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study, in which a hundred human teeth with single straight canal were used, focused on the evaluation of contrast solution penetration ability into the simulated lateral canals activated by XP-endo Finisher (XPF), EDDY, Nd:YAG, and Er:YAG laser systems with three different observation methods. The root canals were prepared up to X4 at working length using the ProTaper Next system. The teeth were decalcified and simulated lateral canals were created with #8 K-file at 2, 4, and 6 mm levels. Then the teeth were cleared using methyl salicylate and divided into 5 equal groups according to irrigation activation techniques (CSI, XPF, EDDY, Nd:YAG, and Er:YAG laser). After the contrast solution was activated, images of the simulated lateral canals were obtained by a dental microscope, digital radiography, and CBCT. The contrast solution penetration scores at the 2, 4, and 6 mm levels according to irrigation activation techniques and observation methods were analyzed statistically using Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric analysis of variance Bonferroni test post hoc comparisons. With the other 2 parameters are ignored, the highest and lowest contrast solution penetration were observed at 6 and 2 mm simulated lateral canal levels (p < 0.05), in Er:YAG irrigation activation and CSI technique (p < 0.05), and in direct visual and digital radiographic observation method (p < 0.05), respectively. Within the limits of this study, it was determined that the contrast solution penetration into the simulated lateral canals decreased from the coronal to the apical and achieved with the most effective Er:YAG laser activation technique. In addition, direct visual observation was found to be the best method for the assessment of contrast solution penetration.

Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Topics. 2005;10(1):30–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00152.x.CrossRef

Nair PN, Henry S, Cano V, Vera J. Microbial status of apical root canal system of human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after “one-visit” endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99(2):231–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.10.005.CrossRef

Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr, Bate AL, Pitt Ford TR. Histologic investigation of root canal-treated teeth with apical periodontitis: a retrospective study from twenty-four patients. J Endod. 2009;35(4):493–502.CrossRef

Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr. Fate of the tissue in lateral canals and apical ramifications in response to pathologic conditions and treatment procedures. J Endod. 2010;36(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.038.CrossRef

Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H, Coil JM. Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. Endod Topics. 2005;10(1):77–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00135.x.CrossRef

de Gregorio C, Estevez R, Cisneros R, Paranjpe A, Cohenca N. Efficacy of different irrigation and activation systems on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into simulated lateral canals and up to working length: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2010;36(7):1216–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.019.CrossRef

Darcey J, Jawad S, Taylor C, Roudsari RV, Hunter M. Modern endodontic principles part 4: irrigation. Dent Update. 2016;43(1):20–2.CrossRef

Ozbay Y, Erdemir A. Effect of several laser systems on removal of smear layer with a variety of irrigation solutions. Microsc Res Tech. 2018;81(10):1214–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23122.CrossRef

Peters OA, Bardsley S, Fong J, Pandher G, Divito E. Disinfection of root canals with photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming. J Endod. 2011;37(7):1008–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.03.016.CrossRef

10.

Haapasalo M, Wang Z, Shen Y, Curtis A, Patel P, Khakpour M. Tissue dissolution by a novel multisonic ultracleaning system and sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 2014;40(8):1178–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.029.CrossRef

11.

Duque JA, Duarte MA, Canali LC, Zancan RF, Vivan RR, Bernardes RA, et al. Comparative effectiveness of new mechanical irrigant agitating devices for debris removal from the canal and isthmus of mesial roots of mandibular molars. J Endod. 2017;43(2):326–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.009.CrossRef

12.

Azim AA, Aksel H, Zhuang T, Mashtare T, Babu JP, Huang GT. Efficacy of 4 irrigation protocols in killing bacteria colonized in dentinal tubules examined by a novel confocal laser scanning microscope analysis. J Endod. 2016;42(6):928–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.009.CrossRef

13.

Pacheco-Yanes J, Provenzano JC, Marceliano-Alves MF, Gazzaneo I, Pérez AR, Gonçalves LS, et al. Distribution of sodium hypochlorite throughout the mesial root canal system of mandibular molars after adjunctive irrigant activation procedures: a micro-computed tomographic study. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(2):907–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02970-5.CrossRef

14.

Galler KM, Grubmüller V, Schlichting R, Widbiller M, Eidt A, Schuller C, et al. Penetration depth of irrigants into root dentine after sonic, ultrasonic and photoacoustic activation. Int Endod J. 2019;52(8):1210–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13108.CrossRef

15.

Sathe S, Hegde V, Jain P, Ghunawat D. Effectiveness of Er: YAG (PIPS) and Nd: YAG activation on final irrigants for smear layer removal - SEM observation. J Dent Lasers. 2014;8(1):8–13. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-2868.134110.CrossRef

16.

Ayranci LB, Arslan H, Akcay M, Capar ID, Gok T, Saygili G. Effectiveness of laser-assisted irrigation and passive ultrasonic irrigation techniques on smear layer removal in middle and apical thirds. Scanning. 2016;38(2):121–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21247.CrossRef

17.

Sahar-Helft S, Sarp AS, Stabholtz A, Gutkin V, Redenski I, Steinberg D. Comparison of positive-pressure, passive ultrasonic, and laser-activated irrigations on smear-layer removal from the root canal surface. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015;33(3):129–35. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2014.3788.CrossRef

18.

Akyuz Ekim SN, Erdemir A. Comparison of different irrigation activation techniques on smear layer removal: an in vitro study. Microsc Res Tech. 2015;78(3):230–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22466.CrossRef

19.

Alsubait S, Alshaibani Y, Alshehri N, Alnuwaiser N, Alajimi T, Almaflehi N, et al. Efficacy of different endodontic irrigant activation techniques on debris removal from the mesial root canal system of mandibular molars. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22(3):231–6. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3054.CrossRef

20.

Marques-da-Silva B, Alberton CS, Tomazinho FSF, Gabardo MCL, Duarte MAH, Vivan RR, et al. Effectiveness of five instruments when removing calcium hydroxide paste from simulated internal root resorption cavities in extracted maxillary central incisors. Int Endod J. 2020;53(3):366–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13223.CrossRef

21.

Urban K, Donnermeyer D, Schäfer E, Bürklein S. Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(9):2681–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2070-x.CrossRef

22.

Donnermeyer D, Wyrsch H, Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Removal of calcium hydroxide from artificial grooves in straight root canals: sonic activation using EDDY versus passive ultrasonic irrigation and XPendo finisher. J Endod. 2019;45(3):322–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.11.001.CrossRef

23.

Alakshar A, Saleh ARM, Gorduysus MO. Debris and smear layer removal from oval root canals comparing XP-endo finisher, endoactivator, and manual irrigation: A SEM Evaluation. Eur J Dent. 2020;14(4):626–33. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714762.CrossRef

24.

Jayakumaar A, Ganesh A, Kalaiselvam R, Rajan M, Deivanayagam K. Evaluation of debris and smear layer removal with XP-endo finisher: a scanning electron microscopic study. Indian J Dent Res. 2019;30(3):420–3. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_655_17.CrossRef

25.

Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the mandibular anterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1974;89(2):369–71.CrossRef

26.

Gilles J, Reader A. An SEM investigation of the mesiolingual canal in human maxillary first and second molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990;70(5):638–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(90)90415-o.CrossRef

27.

Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV. Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, cone-beam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, spiral computed tomography, and plain and contrast medium-enhanced digital radiography in studying root canal morphology. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1547–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.05.008.CrossRef

28.

Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography. J Endod. 2007;33(9):1121–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.011.CrossRef

29.

Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, Versiani MA, Moldauer BI, Topham G, Gutmann JL, et al. Comparative accuracy of the clearing technique, CBCT and micro-CT methods in studying the mesial root canal configuration of mandibular first molars. Int Endod J. 2017;50(1):90–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12593.CrossRef

30.

de Gregorio C, Estevez R, Cisneros R, Heilborn C, Cohenca N. Effect of EDTA, sonic, and ultrasonic activation on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into simulated lateral canals: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2009;35(6):891–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.015.CrossRef

31.

Barbizam JV, Souza M, Cecchin D, Dabbel J. Effectiveness of a silicon-based root canal sealer for filling of simulated lateral canals. Braz Dent J. 2007;18(1):20–3. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-64402007000100005.CrossRef

32.

Hamdan R, Michetti J, Pinchon D, Diemer F, Georgelin-Gurgel M. The XP-endo finisher for the removal of calcium hydroxide paste from root canals and from the apical third. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(7):e855–60. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53962.CrossRef

33.

Uslu G, Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Gündoğar M, Plotino G. Apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation with reciproc blue, HyFlex EDM, and XP-endo shaper nickel-titanium files. J Endod. 2018;44(5):856–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.018.CrossRef

34.

Uğur Aydın Z, Keskin NB, Özyürek T. Effect of reciproc blue, XP-endo shaper, and waveone gold instruments on dentinal microcrack formation: a micro-computed tomographic evaluation. Microsc Res Tech. 2019;82(6):856–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23227.CrossRef

35.

Spoorthy E, Velmurugan N, Ballal S, Nandini S. Comparison of irrigant penetration up to working length and into simulated lateral canals using various irrigating techniques. Int Endod J. 2013;46(9):815–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12065.CrossRef

36.

Goldberg F, Artaza LP, De Silvio A. Effectiveness of different obturation techniques in the filling of simulated lateral canals. J Endod. 2001;27(5):362–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200105000-00015.CrossRef

37.

Singh S, Pawar M, Podar R, Kulkarni G, Bhanushali N. Root canal morphology of South Asian Indian mandibular first, second, and third molar: a dye penetration and clearing study. J Conserv Dent. 2020;23(3):284–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.Jcd_379_20.CrossRef

38.

Kosarieh E, Bolhari B, Sanjari Pirayvatlou S, Kharazifard MJ, Sattari Khavas S, Jafarnia S, et al. Effect of Er:YAG laser irradiation using SWEEPS and PIPS technique on dye penetration depth after root canal preparation. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021;33:102136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102136.CrossRef

39.

Castelo-Baz P, Lozano FJR, Ginzo-Villamayor MJ, Vila RM, Seoane-Romero J, Martín-Cruces J, et al. Efficacy of continuous apical negative ultrasonic irrigation (CANUI) in penetration of simulated lateral canals in extracted teeth. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):10908. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90430-0.CrossRef

40.

Arslan H, Abbas A, Karataş E. Influence of ultrasonic and sonic activation of epoxy-amine resin-based sealer on penetration of sealer into lateral canals. Clin Oral Investig. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1737-z.CrossRef

41.

Parente JM, Loushine RJ, Susin L, Gu L, Looney SW, Weller RN, et al. Root canal debridement using manual dynamic agitation or the EndoVac for final irrigation in a closed system and an open system. Int Endod J. 2010;43(11):1001–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01755.x.CrossRef

42.

Tay FR, Gu LS, Schoeffel GJ, Wimmer C, Susin L, Zhang K, et al. Effect of vapor lock on root canal debridement by using a side-vented needle for positive-pressure irrigant delivery. J Endod. 2010;36(4):745–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.022.CrossRef

43.

Levy G, Rizoiu I, Friedman S, Lam H. Pressure waves in root canals induced by Nd: YAG laser. J Endod. 1996;22(2):81–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(96)80278-0.CrossRef

44.

Blanken J, De Moor RJ, Meire M, Verdaasdonk R. Laser induced explosive vapor and cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal part 1: a visualization study. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41(7):514–9.CrossRef

45.

De Moor RJ, Blanken J, Meire M, Verdaasdonk R. Laser induced explosive vapor and cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal part 2: evaluation of the efficacy. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41(7):520–3.CrossRef

46.

Matsumoto H, Yoshimine Y, Akamine A. Visualization of irrigant flow and cavitation induced by Er:YAG laser within a root canal model. J Endod. 2011;37(6):839–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.035.CrossRef

47.

Castelo-Baz P, Martín-Biedma B, Cantatore G, Ruíz-Piñón M, Bahillo J, Rivas-Mundiña B, et al. In vitro comparison of passive and continuous ultrasonic irrigation in simulated lateral canals of extracted teeth. J Endod. 2012;38(5):688–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.032.CrossRef

48.

Koch JD, Jaramillo DE, DiVito E, Peters OA. Irrigant flow during photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV). Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(2):381–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1562-9.CrossRef

49.

Haupt F, Meinel M, Gunawardana A, Hülsmann M. Effectiveness of different activated irrigation techniques on debris and smear layer removal from curved root canals: a SEM evaluation. Aust Endod J. 2020;46(1):40–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12342.CrossRef

50.

Ahmad M, Pitt Ford TR, Crum LA, Walton AJ. Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: acoustic cavitation and its relevance. J Endod. 1988;14(10):486–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80105-5.CrossRef

51.

Filzmoser P, Hron K, Reimann C. Univariate statistical analysis of environmental (compositional) data: problems and possibilities. Sci Total Environ. 2009;407(23):6100–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.08.008.CrossRef

52.

Barde M, Barde P. What to use to express the variability of data: standard deviation or standard error of mean? Perspect Clin Res. 2012;3(3):113–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.100662.CrossRef

53.

Stabholz A, Sahar-Helft S, Moshonov J. Lasers in endodontics. Dent Clin N Am. 2004;48(4):809–32.CrossRef

Titel: Effect of different irrigation activation techniques on irrigation penetration into the simulated lateral canals
verfasst von: Mehmet Eren Fidan
Ali Erdemir
Publikationsdatum: 14.07.2022
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in: Odontology / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1618-1247
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-1255
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-022-00729-1

Update Zahnmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Effect of different irrigation activation techniques on irrigation penetration into the simulated lateral canals

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Update Zahnmedizin

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

Neural network approach to evaluate the physical properties of dentin

Effects of continuous chelation on the instrumentation of curved canals with a martensitic NiTi file system: an ex vivo micro-CT evaluation

Update on citric acid use in endodontic treatment: a systematic review

Cone beam computed tomography assessment of the prevalence and association of pulp calcification with periodontitis

External validation of cone-beam computed tomography- and panoramic radiography-featured prediction models for inferior alveolar nerve injury after lower third molar removal: proposal of a risk calculator

Antimicrobial effects of agitational irrigation on single- and multispecies biofilms in dentin canals

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Update Zahnmedizin