Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 1/2021

Open Access 01.12.2021 | Correction

Correction to: Reference ranges (“normal values”) for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update

verfasst von: Nadine Kawel-Boehm, Scott J. Hetzel, Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh, Gabriella Captur, Christopher J. Francois, Michael Jerosch-Herold, Michael Salerno, Shawn D. Teague, Emanuela Valsangiacomo-Buechel, Rob J. van der Geest, David A. Bluemke

Erschienen in: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance | Ausgabe 1/2021

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Hinweise
The original article can be found online at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12968-020-00683-3.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Correction to: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson (2020) 22: 87 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12968-020-00683-3

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified an error in table 39.
The original publication by Davis et al. in JCMR in 2014, which was cited in table 39 of Kawel-Boehm in 2020, presented data in an unusual format (mean ± 2*SD instead of mean ± SD), inducing an error in the calculation of the lower and upper limits of Kawel-Boehm [1].
The incorrect and correct table 39 are shown in this correction article as Tables 1 and 2. The original article has been updated.
Table.1
Incorrect table 39
Level
Men (n = 208)
Mean ± SD (LL–UL)a
Women (n = 239)
Mean ± SD (LL–UL)a
Ascending aorta diameter (mm)
27 ± 8 (11–42)
26 ± 7 (11–40)
Proximal descending aorta diameter (mm)
21 ± 6 (9–32)
19 ± 4 (11–27)
Distal descending aorta diameter (mm)
18 ± 5 (7–28)
16 ± 4 (8–24)
Measurements obtained on cross-sectional bSSFP images of the aorta
bSSFP balanced steady-state free precession, n number of study subjects, SD standard deviation, LL lower limit, UL upper limit
aCalculated as mean ± 2*SD
Table.2
Correct table 39: Normal values of the thoracic aortic luminal diameters for men and women measured at diastole on bSSFP images according to [86]
Level
Men (n = 208)
mean ± SD (LL–UL)*
Women (n = 239)
mean ± SD (LL–UL)*
Ascending aorta diameter (mm)
27 ± 4 (19–34)
26 ± 4 (18–33)
Proximal descending aorta diameter (mm)
21 ± 3 (15–26)
19 ± 2 (15–23)
Distal descending aorta diameter (mm)
18 ± 3 (13–23)
16 ± 2 (12–20)
Measurements obtained on cross-sectional bSSFP images of the aorta
bSSFP balanced steady-state free precession, n number of study subjects, SD standard deviation, LL lower limit, UL upper limit
*Calculated as mean ± 2*SD
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
Literatur
Metadaten
Titel
Correction to: Reference ranges (“normal values”) for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update
verfasst von
Nadine Kawel-Boehm
Scott J. Hetzel
Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh
Gabriella Captur
Christopher J. Francois
Michael Jerosch-Herold
Michael Salerno
Shawn D. Teague
Emanuela Valsangiacomo-Buechel
Rob J. van der Geest
David A. Bluemke
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2021
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance / Ausgabe 1/2021
Elektronische ISSN: 1532-429X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00815-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Mammakarzinom: Brustdichte beeinflusst rezidivfreies Überleben

26.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Frauen, die zum Zeitpunkt der Brustkrebsdiagnose eine hohe mammografische Brustdichte aufweisen, haben ein erhöhtes Risiko für ein baldiges Rezidiv, legen neue Daten nahe.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.