nach oben

Oral Radiology

Erschienen in:

24.03.2023 | Original Article

Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of strip and furcal perforations in different sizes by cone beam computed tomography

verfasst von: Zahra Ghoncheh, Hanieh Kaviani, Sara Soleimani, Shifteh Nasri, Fatemeh Malekpour, Farzaneh Afkhami

Erschienen in: Oral Radiology | Ausgabe 4/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

Root perforation is an adverse event that may accidentally occur during root canal treatment and can adversely affect the treatment plan and tooth prognosis. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for detecting the strip and furcal perforations with different sizes.

Methods

The mesiolingual canals of 155 extracted human mandibular first molars were instrumented and randomly divided into four experimental groups and one control group (n = 31). Furcal (in the pulp chamber floor) and strip perforations with 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 mm in diameter were manually created. The teeth were randomly mounted in bovine ribs and scanned using CBCT. Two radiologists unaware of the study groups observed the images and reported the greatest perforation diameter. The inter-observer agreements were calculated. The diagnostic accuracy was compared for furcal and strip perforations with different sizes.

Results

The inter-observer agreement for detecting furcal and strip perforations with different sizes were good. The diagnostic accuracy was 100% for the absence of perforation in each group.

Conclusions

CBCT can detect the absence of perforation with high accuracy. The diagnostic accuracy of CBCT in the presence of strip and furcal perforation with different sizes was not significant.

Kamburoğlu K, Yeta EN, Yılmaz F. An ex vivo comparison of diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in the detection of furcal perforations. J Endod. 2015;41:696–702.CrossRefPubMed

Sarao SK, Berlin-Broner Y, Levin L. Occurrence and risk factors of dental root perforations: a systematic review. Int Dent J. 2021;71:96–105.CrossRefPubMedCentral

Saed SM, Ashley M, Darcey J. Root perforations: aetiology, management strategies and outcomes. The hole truth. Br Dent J. 2016;220:171.CrossRefPubMed

Shemesh H, Cristescu RC, Wesselink PR, Wu M-K. The use of cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiographs to diagnose root perforations. J Endod. 2011;37:513–6.CrossRefPubMed

Kvinnsland I, Oswald R, Halse A, Grønningsaeter A. A clinical and roentgenological study of 55 cases of root perforation. Int Endod J. 1989;22:75–84.CrossRefPubMed

Shokri A, Eskandarloo A, Noruzi-Gangachin M, Khajeh S. Detection of root perforations using conventional and digital intraoral radiography, multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography. Restor Dent Endod. 2015;40:58–67.CrossRefPubMed

Harris SP, Bowles WR, Fok A, McClanahan SB. An anatomic investigation of the mandibular first molar using micro-computed tomography. J Endod. 2013;39:1374–8.CrossRefPubMed

Vehkalahti MM, Swanljung O. Accidental perforations during root canal treatment: an 8-year nationwide perspective on healthcare malpractice claims. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:3683–90.CrossRefPubMed

Abdinian M, Moshkforoush S, Hemati H, Soltani P, Moshkforoushan M, Spagnuolo G. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography and digital radiography in detecting separated endodontic files and strip perforation. Appl Sci. 2020;10:8726.CrossRef

10.

Khojastepour L, Moazami F, Babaei M, Forghani M. Assessment of root perforation within simulated internal resorption cavities using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2015;41:1520–3.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Afkhami F, Ghoncheh Z, Khadiv F, Kaviani H, Shamshiri AR. How does voxel size of cone-beam computed tomography effect accurate detection of root strip perforations. Iran Endod J. 2021;16:43–8.PubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994;6:284.CrossRef

13.

D’Assunção FLC, Sousa JCN, Felinto KCA, de Medeiros TC, Leite DT, de Lucena RB, et al. Accuracy and repeatability of 3 apex locators in locating root canal perforations: an ex vivo study. J Endod. 2014;40:1241–4.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Silva M, Caliari M, Sobrinho A, Vieira L, Arantes R. An in vivo experimental model to assess furcal lesions as a result of perforation. Int Endod J. 2009;42:922–9.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Azim AA, Lloyd A, Huang GT-J. Management of longstanding furcation perforation using a novel approach. J Endod. 2014;40:1255–9.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Rahimi S, Ghasemi N, Shahi S, Lotfi M, Froughreyhani M, Milani AS, et al. Effect of blood contamination on the retention characteristics of two endodontic biomaterials in simulated furcation perforations. J Endod. 2013;39:697–700.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Silva LAB, Pieroni KAMG, Nelson-Filho P, Silva RAB, Hernandéz-Gatón P, Lucisano MP, et al. Furcation perforation: periradicular tissue response to biodentine as a repair material by histopathologic and indirect immunofluorescence analyses. J Endod. 2017;43:1137–42.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Venskutonis T, Plotino G, Juodzbalys G, Mickevičienė L. The importance of cone-beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems: a review of the literature. J Endod. 2014;40:1895–901.CrossRefPubMed

19.

D’addazio P, Campos C, Özcan M, Teixeira H, Passoni R, Carvalho A. A comparative study between cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiographs in the diagnosis of simulated endodontic complications. Int Endod J. 2011;44:218–24.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Pérez-Heredia M, Ferrer-Luque CM, Bravo M, Castelo-Baz P, Ruíz-Piñón M, Baca P. Cone-beam computed tomographic study of root anatomy and canal configuration of molars in a Spanish population. J Endod. 2017;43:1511–6.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Akbarzadeh N, Aminoshariae A, Khalighinejad N, Palomo JM, Syed A, Kulild JC, et al. The association between the anatomic landmarks of the pulp chamber floor and the prevalence of middle mesial canals in mandibular first molars: an in vivo analysis. J Endod. 2017;43:1797–801.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante C, Versiani M, Moldauer B, Topham G, Gutmann J, et al. Comparative accuracy of the Clearing Technique, CBCT and Micro-CT methods in studying the mesial root canal configuration of mandibular first molars. Int Endod J. 2017;50:90–6.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Berutti E, Fedon G. Thickness of cementum/dentin in mesial roots of mandibular first molars. J Endod. 1992;18:545–8.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Parrone MT, Bechara B, Deahl ST II, Ruparel NB, Katkar R, Noujeim M. Cone beam computed tomography image optimization to detect root fractures in endodontically treated teeth: an in vitro (phantom) study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123:613–20.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Ferreira TJ, Vieira MT, Costa J, Gato PT. Manufacturing dental implants using powder injection molding. J Orthod Endod. 2016;2:21.

26.

Schropp L, Alyass N, Wenzel A, Stavropoulos A. Validity of wax and acrylic as soft-tissue simulation materials used in in vitro radiographic studies. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41:686–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of strip and furcal perforations in different sizes by cone beam computed tomography
verfasst von: Zahra Ghoncheh
Hanieh Kaviani
Sara Soleimani
Shifteh Nasri
Fatemeh Malekpour
Farzaneh Afkhami
Publikationsdatum: 24.03.2023
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in: Oral Radiology / Ausgabe 4/2023
Print ISSN: 0911-6028
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-9674
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-023-00681-y

Update Zahnmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of strip and furcal perforations in different sizes by cone beam computed tomography