nach oben

Oral Radiology

Erschienen in:

12.09.2022 | Original Article

Are maxillary sinus variations related to maxillary sinus diameters?

verfasst von: Halil Ayyildiz, Faruk Akgunlu

Erschienen in: Oral Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The reasons why the maxillary posterior region is challenging for dentists are its structure and anatomical variations. For this reason, it is necessary to have complete knowledge about the anatomy of this region. In dentistry, necessary information for the desired evaluation in this region can be provided by CBCT. The fact that it provides a three-dimensional evaluation and has measurement reliability emphasizes its importance in surgical applications. The septa, haller cell, and accessory ostium are variations of the maxillary sinus. There are few studies in the literature examining the relationship between maxillary sinus diameters and its variations. The aims of this study are to determine the prevalence of maxillary sinus variations and the average of maxillary sinus diameters, to examine their relationships according to age and gender, and to evaluate the effects of maxillary sinus diameters on variations.

Methods

In this retrospective study, CBCT images of 212 patients were examined. The examined CBCT images were analysed and recorded in more than one section. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, independent t test, one-way Anova tests were used to evaluate the data.

Results

As a result, a statistically significant difference was observed between the variations, gender and age groups in terms of morphometric characteristics of the maxillary sinus. The most common variation was observed to be accessory ostium.

Conclusions

The rate of patients with at least one anatomical variation was 77.8%. For this reason, a detailed analysis should be performed to avoid complications before surgical procedures are performed in the area.

Maspero C, Farronato M, Bellincioni F, Annibale A, Machetti J, Abate A, Davide C. Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary sinus changes in growing subjects: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Materials (Basel). 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13041007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Dedeoglu N, Altun O. Evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomical variations and pathologies in elderly, young, posterior dentate and edentulous patient groups with cone-beam computed tomography. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2019. https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2019.0013.CrossRefPubMed

Padhye NM, Bhatavadekar NB. Quantitative assessment of the edentulous posterior maxilla for implant therapy: a retrospective cone beam computed tomographic study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2019.49.4.237.CrossRefPubMed

Yu SJ, Lee YH, Lin CP, Wu AYJ. Computed tomographic analysis of maxillary sinus anatomy relevant to sinus lift procedures in edentulous ridges in Taiwanese patients. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2019.49.4.237.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Krennmair G, Ulm C, Lugmayr H. Maxillary sinus septa: incidence, morphology and clinical implications. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-5182(97)80063-7.CrossRefPubMed

Orhan K, KusakciSeker B, Aksoy S, Bayindir H, Berberoglu A, Seker E. Cone beam CT evaluation of maxillary sinus septa prevalence, height, location and morphology in children and an adult population. Med Princ Pract. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339849.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kim MJ, Jung UW, Kim CS, Kim KD, Choi SH, Kim CK, Cho KS. Maxillary sinus septa: prevalence, height, location, and morphology. A reformatted computed tomography scan analysis. J Periodontol. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050247.CrossRefPubMed

Koymen R, Gocmen-Mas N, Karacayli U, Ortakoglu K, Ozen T, Yazici AC. Anatomic evaluation of maxillary sinus septa: surgery and radiology. Clin Anat. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20813.CrossRefPubMed

Lana JP, Carneiro PMR, de Carvalho MV, de Souza PEA, Manzi FR, Horta MCR. Anatomic variations and lesions of the maxillary sinus detected in cone beam computed tomography for dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02321.x.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Lozano-Carrascal N, Salomo-Coll O, Gehrke SA, Calvo-Guirado JL, Hernandez-Alfaro F, Gargallo-Albiol J. Radiological evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomy: a cross-sectional study of 300 patients. Ann Anat. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2017.06.002.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Park YB, Jeon HS, Shim JS, Lee KW, Moon HS. Analysis of the anatomy of the maxillary sinus septum using 3-dimensional computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.020.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Shibli JA, Faveri M, Ferrari DS, Melo L, Garcia RV, d’Avila S, Figueiredo LC, Feres M. Prevalence of maxillary sinus septa in 1024 subjects with edentulous upper jaws: a retrospective study. J Oral Implantol. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[293:POMSSI]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Ali IK, Sansare K, Karjodkar FR, Vanga K, Salve P, Pawar AM. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of accessory maxillary ostium and Haller cells: prevalence and clinical significance. Imaging Sci Dent. 2017. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2017.47.1.33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Zirek A, Beklen H, Okyay Budak R, Güler OK, Yardimci AC, Bozkus F. Paranazal sinüslerde anatomik varyasyonların sıklığı ve enflamatuar sinüs hastalıklarına etkisi. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016;13(3):215–22.

15.

Amine K, Slaoui S, Kanice FZ, Kissa J. Evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomical variations and lesions: a retrospective analysis using cone beam computed tomography. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2019.12.021.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Hungerbuhler A, Rostetter C, Lubbers HT, Rucker M, Stadlinger B. Anatomical characteristics of maxillary sinus septa visualized by cone beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2018.09.009.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Bornstein MM, Seiffert C, Maestre-Ferrin L, Fodich I, Jacobs R, Buser D, von Arx T. An analysis of frequency, morphology, and locations of maxillary sinus septa using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2018.09.009.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Shahidi S, Zamiri B, MomeniDanaei S, Salehi S, Hamedani S. Evaluation of anatomic variations in maxillary sinus with the aid of Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in a population in South of Iran. J Dent (Shiraz). 2016;17(1):7–15.PubMed

19.

BirikenSipahi D, Beycan K, Ercalik YS. Maksiller sinus hacminin ve septum morfolojisinin Angle Sınıf I, II ve III iskeletsel iliskiye sahip bireylerde uc boyutlu olarak degerlendirilmesi. Selcuk Dent J. 2019;6(4):216–21.

20.

Selcuk A, Ozcan KM, Akdogan O, Bilal N, Dere H. Variations of maxillary sinus and accompanying anatomical and pathological structures. J Craniofac Surg. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e3181577b01.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Kocak N, Alpoz E, Boyacioglu H. Morphological assessment of maxillary sinus septa variations with cone-beam computed tomography in a turkish population. Eur J Dent. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688541.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Hung K, Montalvao C, Yeung AWK, Li G, Bornstein MM. Frequency, location, and morphology of accessory maxillary sinus ostia: a retrospective study using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Surg Radiol Anat. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02308-6.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Onwuchekwa RC, Alazigha N. Computed tomography anatomy of the paranasal sinuses and anatomical variants of clinical relevants in Nigerian adults. Egypt J Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejenta.2016.11.001.CrossRef

24.

Ozel HE, Ozdogan F, Esen E, Genc MG, Genc S, Selcuk A. The association between septal deviation and the presence of a maxillary accessory ostium. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21610.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Yenigun A, Fazliogullari Z, Gun C, Uysal II, Nayman A, Karabulut AK. The effect of the presence of the accessory maxillary ostium on the maxillary sinus. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4129-8.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Yeung AWK, Consoul N, Montalvao C, Hung K, Jacobs R, Bornstein MM. Visibility, location, and morphology of the primary maxillary sinus ostium and presence of accessory ostia: a retrospective analysis using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Clin Oral Investig. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02829-9.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Simsek Kaya G, Dalbatan O, Kaya M, Kocabalkan B, Sindel A, Akdag M. The potential clinical relevance of anatomical structures and variations of the maxillary sinus for planned sinus floor elevation procedures: a retrospective cone beam computed tomography study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12703.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Akay G, Yaman D, Karadag O, Gungor K. Evaluation of the relationship of dimensions of maxillary sinus drainage system with anatomical variations and sinusopathy: cone-beam computed tomography findings. Med Princ Pract. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1159/000504963.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Mathew R, Omami G, Hand A, Fellows D, Lurie A. Cone beam CT analysis of Haller cells: prevalence and clinical significance. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20130055.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Prem Kumar KS, Sudarshan R, Vijayabala GS, Srinivasan SR, Kini PV. A study on the assessment of Haller Cells in panoramic radiograph. Niger Med J. 2018. https://doi.org/10.4103/nmj.NMJ_166_18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Yilmazsoy Y, Arslan S. Haller hucresi varyasyon sikliği ve maksiller sinuzit ile iliskisinin bilgisayarli tomografi ile degerlendirilmesi. J Health Sci Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.442889.CrossRef

32.

Yucel A, Derekoy FS, Yilmaz MD, Altuntas A. Sinonazal anatomik varyasyonlarin paranazal sinüs enfeksiyonlarina etkisi. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi. 2004;5(1):43–7.

33.

Dursun E, Korkmaz H, Bayiz U, Gocmen H, Samim E, Eryilmaz A, Ozeri C. Maksiller Mukozal Retansiyon Kistlerinde Cerrahi Yaklasımlar ve Ostiomeatal Kompleks Anatomik Varyasyonları. T Klin KBB. 2001;1:154–61.

34.

Misirlioglu M, Nalcaci R, Adisen MZ, Yilmaz YS. Paranasal sinus anatomik yapilari ve varyasyonlarinin dental volumetrik tomografi ile incelenmesi. A Ü Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2011;38(3):143–52.

35.

Cha JK, Song YW, Park SH, Jung RE, Jung UW, Thoma DS. Alveolar ridge preservation in the posterior maxilla reduces vertical dimentional change: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13436.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Lombardi T, Bernardello F, Berton F, Porrelli D, Rapani A, Piloni AC, Forillo L, Di Lenarda R, Stacchi C. Efficacy of alveolar ridge preservation after maxillary molar extraction in reducing crestal bone resorption and sinus pneumatization: a multicenter prospective case-control study. BioMed Res Int. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9352130.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Whyte A, Boeddinghaus R. The maxillary sinus: physiology, development and imaging anatomy. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20190205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Kocak N. Maksiller sinusun radyolojik tani yontemlerinin ve anatomik limitasyonlarinin tedavi planlanmasinda rolu. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.296422.CrossRef

39.

Wolff C, Mucke T, Wagenpfeil S, Kanatas A, Bissinger O, Deppe H. Do CBCT scans alter surgical treatment plans? Comparison of preoperative surgical diagnosis using panoramic versus cone-beam CT images. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.025.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Donizeth-Rodrigues C, Fonseca-De Silveira M, Goncalves-De Alencar AH, Garcia Santos Silva MA, Francisco-Dde Mendonca E, Estrela C. Three-dimensional images contribute to the diagnosis of mucous retention cyst in maxillary sinus. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18141.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Tadinada A, Fung K, Thacker S, Mahdian M, Jadhav A, Schincaglia GP. Radiographic evaluation of the maxillary sinus prior to dental implant therapy: a comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional radiographic imaging. Imaging Sci Dent. 2015. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2015.45.3.169.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Vogiatzi T, Kloukos D, Scarfe WC, Bornstein MM. Incidence of anatomical variations and disease of the maxillary sinuses as identified by cone beam computed tomography: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3644.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Constantine S, Clark B, Kiermeier A, Anderson PP. Panoramic radiography is of limited value in the evaluation of maxillary sinus disease. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2018.10.005.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Ozalp O, Tezerisener HA, Kocabalkan B, Buyukkaplan US, Özarslan MM, Simsek Kaya G, Altay MA, Sindel A. Comparing the precision of panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in avoiding anatomical structures critical to dental implant surgery: a retrospective study. Imaging Sci Dent. 2018. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2018.48.4.269.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Tarim E, Kalabalik F. Bir turk orneklem grubunda dental volumetrik tomogafi endikasyonlari. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2014. https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.80367.CrossRef

46.

Akhlaghi M, Bakhtavar K, Kamali A, Maarefdoost J, Sheikhazadi A, Mousavi F, SaberyAnary SH, Sheikhazadi E. The diagnostic value of anthropometric indices of maxillary sinuses for sex determination using CT-scan images in Iranian adults: a cross-sectional study. J Forensic Leg Med. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.05.017.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Dangore-Khasbage S, Bhowate R. Utility of the morphometry of the maxillary sinuses for gender determination by using computed tomography. Dent Med Probl. 2018. https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/99622.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Lorkiewicz-Muszynska D, Kociemba W, Rewekant A, Sroka A, Jonczyk-Potoczna K, PatelskaBanaszewska M, Przystanska A. Development of the maxillary sinus from birth to age 18. Postnatal growth pattern. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.05.032.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Paknahad M, Shahidi S, Zarei Z. Sexual dimorphism of maxillary sinus dimensions using cone-beam computed tomography. J Forensic Sci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13272.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Cakur B, Sumbullu MA, Durna D, Yilmaz AB. Antral septa varlıgı ile maksiller sinus yukseklıgı arasindaki iliski. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2011;1:1–4.

51.

Demirkol M, Demirkol N. The effects of posterior alveolar bone height on the height of maxillary sinus septa. Surg Radiol Anat. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02271-2.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Devaraja K, Doreswamy SM, Pujary K, Ramaswamy B, Pillai S. Anatomical variations of the nose and paranasal sinuses: a computed tomographic study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-019-01716-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Are maxillary sinus variations related to maxillary sinus diameters?
verfasst von: Halil Ayyildiz
Faruk Akgunlu
Publikationsdatum: 12.09.2022
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in: Oral Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 0911-6028
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-9674
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-022-00655-6

Update Zahnmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Are maxillary sinus variations related to maxillary sinus diameters?

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Update Zahnmedizin

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

Reduction of scratch or dirt artifacts on intraoral radiographs using dual imaging plates in image processing

High prevalence of taurodontism in North China and its relevant factors: a retrospective cohort study

Magnetic resonance imaging of methotrexate-related lymphoproliferative disorder with a chief complaint of oral symptoms

Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts caused by orthodontic appliances and/or implant-supported prosthesis: a systematic review

Analysis of image defects in digital intraoral radiography based on photostimulable phosphor plates

Are morphological and morphometric characteristics of maxillary anterior region and nasopalatine canal related to each other?

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Update Zahnmedizin